this is kind of interesting (to me, if not to you): i am thinking of three bands which i like (to varying degrees), each comprising (in their 'typical' structures, at least) four male musicians, these being a drummer, a bass guitarist and two guitarists (in some cases 1 rhythm & 1 lead).
these bands, in chronological order (of debut/appearance are):
- the beatles
- KISS
- the church
each of these has a kind of 'core duo' which many would say is the dominant/driving force or presence of the particular band - for the beatles it's lennon & mccartney, for KISS it's paul stanley & gene simmos, and for the church it's steve kilbey & marty willson-piper. in each case the duo comprises a bassist & a guitarist, as well as one being the lead singer (or perhaps lead voclas being usually shared between the two).
well, my point is that in each band, my favourite member is the guitarist who is_NOT_in the 'core duo' of the respective band, i.e.:
- george harrison in the beatles
- ace frehley in KISS
- peter koppes in the church
curious. im my opinion each of these favourites of mine is relatively more enigmatic & interesting than the two in the core duo. and they each bring new & unique dimensions to their respective bands, i think.
so there u go. 'well, blow my down with a feather!' i hear u all say as u read this. ;-D
actually it's maybe interesting to note that each of those 3 bands changed drummers quite early in thier careers - well, except KISS who lost peter criss (the cat) after about 6-7 albums.
this drummer turnover reminds me of spinal tap who kept losing drummers, allegedly due to 'bizarre gardening accidents'. actually in the case of spinal tap i guess my favourite would be thier bassist - derek small i _THINK_his name was [?] and he too was not in the core duo of spinal tap!
~